The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Education plc
Abstract
Is the privatisation of state education defendable? Did the public sector ever provide a fair education for all learners? In Education plc, Stephen Ball provides a comprehensive, analytic and empirical account of the privatisation of education. He questions the kind of future we want for education and what role privatisation and the private sector may have in that future. Using policy sociology to describe and critically analyse changes in policy, policy technologies and policy regimes, he looks at the ethical and democratic impacts of these changes and raises the following questions: Is there a legitimacy for privatisation based on the convergence of interests between business and the ‘third way’ state? Is the extent and value of private participation in public education misunderstood? How is the selling of private company services linked to the remodelling of schools? Why have the technical and political issues of privatisation been considered but ethical issues almost totally neglected? What is happening here, beyond mere technical changes in the form of public service delivery? Is education policy being spoken by new voices? Drawing upon extensive documentary research and interviews with senior executives from the leading ‘education services industry’ companies, the author challenges preconceptions about privatisation. He concludes that blanket defence of the public sector as it was, over and against the inroads of privatisation, is untenable, and that there is no going back to a past in which the public sector as a whole worked well and worked fairly in the interests of all learners, because there was no such past. This book breaks new ground and builds on Stephen Ball’s previous work on education policy. It should appeal to those researching and studying in the fields of social policy, policy analysis, sociology of education, education research and social economics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ball, S. J. (2009) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680930802419474 · Cited by 533
Self-citationLingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.820042 · Cited by 394
Place-based governance and leadership in decentralised school systems: evidence from England
Greany, T. (2022) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2020.1792554 · Cited by 61
Johnson, R. L., Sendall, M. C., & McCuaig, L. A. (2014) · Sex Education · doi:10.1080/14681811.2014.909351 · Cited by 55
The Global Diffusion of Education Privatization: Unpacking and Theorizing Policy Adoption
Verger, A. (2016) · The Handbook of Global Education Policy · doi:10.1002/9781118468005.ch3 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Ball, S. J.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2007-03-06
- OpenAlex
- W4234316273
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 54.17
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Education plc. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203964200
- The paper
- Ball, S. J. (2007). Education plc. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.