Cited by 394Global Educational Policies and ReformsEducational Assessment and ImprovementHigher Education Governance and Development

Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: commensurate global and national developments

Lingard, Bob, Martino, Wayne, Rezai-Rashti, Goli·2013·Journal of Education Policy

Abstract

This paper focuses on outlining, contextualising and theorising the rise of global and complementary national modes of test-based, top-down accountability in schooling systems. The effects of these infrastructures of accountability on schools, teachers’ pedagogical work, on the width of curriculum and on the goals of schooling are also alluded to. These developments are theorised in terms of rescaling of the policy cycle globally, as a well as the topological turn that sees the globe reconstituted as a single space of comparative and commensurate measurement of the performance of school systems, as part of the move to new global forms of networked governance. We argue that we are seeing a new global panopticism, with national school systems variously positioned within the global market place and global educational policy field with important effects within national policy-making. The analysis and theorising provided serves as a contextual backdrop and introduction to the papers included in the special issue of the Journal of Education Policy on the theme of Testing Regimes, Accountabilities and Education Policy. We argue, and the papers demonstrate, the significance for policy sociology today of recognising testing as a, perhaps the, major policy steering systems and the work of schools today.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02680939.2013.820042

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Curriculum reform in England has been dominated by a narrowing of the curriculum around priority subjects (English, mathematics and the sciences) and a test-based, numbers-driven accountability.

    “Alongside the trials and tribulations within the music education community, curriculum reform more generally within England has been dominated by a narrowing of the curriculum around subjects that the government consider to be priority areas (English, mathematics and the sciences), and a test-based, numbers-driven accountability (Anagnostopoulos et al., 2013;Lingard et al., 2013Lingard et al., , 2”

    From The policy and practice of music education in England, 2010–2020 (2021) · cites this paper as Lingard et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lingard, Bob
Venue
Journal of Education Policy
Published
2013-09
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
539-556
ISSN
  • 0268-0939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5106
OpenAlex
W2042614593
Cited by
394
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 14
FWCI
130.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Education Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
Keywords
educational accountability, test-based accountability, global education policy, network governance, panopticism, school performance measurement, curriculum narrowing, policy sociology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review