The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Childhood Diversity and Commonality: Some Methodological Insights
Open accessAbstract
An age/developmental based approach is, for example, often incorporated in the methodological design as if it were a ‘natural’ feature of childhood research. Mauthner (1997) for instance argues that the ‘age’ of a child necessarily determines the kinds of research techniques which can be used. Others more unquestioningly take ‘age’ for granted and design their methods to accord with the supposed developmental or cognitive abilities of their study population of children. Thus, as James, Jenks and Prout have questioned: How often do researchers choose an age group simply because they feel that the children will be ‘old enough’ to engage effectively with the researcher’s project, rather than because at that particular age in that particular society children are sharing a particular social, rather than simply, developmental experience?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Christensen and James (2008) emphasise that children are likelier to share genuine thoughts, emotions, and experiences when they feel safe, respected, and understood.”
From Virtual Reality Risks for Children in the Metaverse: An Examination through Criminological Perspectives (2026) · cites this paper as Christensen and James (2008)
Citations
Cites
Rural Appraisal: Rapid, Relaxed and Participatory
Chambers, R. (1992) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 665
Cited by
Sorted by citations
research with children: methodological issues and innovative techniques
Fargas-Malet, M., McSherry, D., Larkin, E., & Robinson, C. (2010) · Journal of Early Childhood Research · doi:10.1177/1476718x09345412 · Cited by 520
Crivello, G., Camfield, L., & Woodhead, M. (2008) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9312-x · Cited by 296
Inviting the messy: Drawing methods and ‘children’s voices’
Eldén, S. (2013) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568212447243 · Cited by 227
Introduction: Childhood and migration — mobilities, homes and belongings
Laoire, C. N., Carpena‐Méndez, F., Tyrrell, N., & White, A. (2010) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568210365463 · Cited by 150
Children's influence on and participation in the family decision process during food buying
Nørgaard, M. K., Bruns, K., Christensen, P., & Mikkelsen, M. R. (2007) · Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers · doi:10.1108/17473610710780945 · Cited by 139
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, P., & James, A.
- Venue
- Research With Children
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2008-03-28
- Pages
- 172-188
- OpenAlex
- W55446994
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 41.19
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- University of Warwick (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Keywords
- childhood research, developmental approach, methodological design, children's cognitive abilities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review