The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Race, Gender and Critical Reflexivity in Research with Young Children
Abstract
This chapter focuses on some of the ways in which race and gender can impact upon research with young children. It provides a critically reflexive account of a previous ethnographic study I conducted in a multi-ethnic, inner-city primary school in England that examined the peer cultures of 5-6-year-old children and the place of race and gender within these (see Connolly 1998). The arguments presented in this chapter are built upon three core premises. While each of these premises is well recognized and accepted, it will be shown in this chapter that, when they are drawn together, they offer a new and important way of understanding the power dynamics that underpin research with young children.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Reflexivity can highlight the complex power relationships that exist between researchers and participants and among children (Connolly, 2008)”
From Adults researching with children (2023) · cites this paper as Connolly, 2008
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- MacNaughton, G. (2005) Doing Foucault in Early Childhood Studies, London: Routledge. · DOI
Cited by
Adults researching with children
Berman, R., & MacNevin, M. (2023) · doi:10.32920/21909258
Metadata
- Authors
- Connolly, P.
- Corresponding author
- Paul Connolly
- ORCID
- Paul Connolly
- Venue
- Research With Children
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2008-03-28
- Pages
- 189-204
- OpenAlex
- W2593580863
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Keywords
- race, gender, critical reflexivity, research with young children, power dynamics in research, peer culture, early childhood, urban schools, ethnography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
