The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences
Abstract
Perhaps something has occurred in the history of the concept of structure that could be called an “event,” if this loaded word did not entail a meaning which it is precisely the function of structural-or structuralist-thought to reduce or to suspect. Let us speak of an “event,” nevertheless, and let us use quotation marks to serve as a precaution. What would this event be then? Its exterior form would be that of a rupture and a redoubling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5 · Cited by 1,537
Semiotics and the social analysis of material things
Keane, W. (2003) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/s0271-5309(03)00010-7 · Cited by 915
Lawtoo, N. (2017) · MLN · doi:10.1353/mln.2017.0092 · Cited by 22
Making a Place To Take a Stand: Jonathan Z. Smith and the Politics and Poetics of Comparison'
Urban, H. B. (2000) · Method & Theory in the Study of Religion · doi:10.1163/157006800x00247 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Venue
- Writing and Difference
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2001-05-18
- Pages
- 375-394
- OpenAlex
- W3005547434
- Cited by
- 1,000
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1263.80
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203991787-14
- The paper
- Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. (2001). Writing and Difference. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203991787-14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
