Multiculturalism
Abstract
Over the past century, multiculturalism has risen in importance around the globe, and more people than ever before in human history now live in multicultural environments. Migrants, what Pico Iyer calls the ‘Floating Tribe’, will soon outnumber Americans (Iyer, 2013). As a result, there have been waves of interest in how to foster multiculturalism, what its impacts are, and what the obstacles are for multicultural communities living in egalitarian peace. The largest body of literature on multicultural interactions focuses on immigrants entering Western countries, primarily in Europe or North America. However, some literature has begun to examine multiculturalism from other standpoints, including minority populations already existing within the dominant culture. The reported benefits of multiculturalism for cognitive abilities will be summarised, and, finally, various theoretical perspectives are employed to understand multicultural dynamics. This includes intergroup contact, social dominance orientation, identity theories, and clinical perspectives such as psychoanalytic theory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
- Authors
- Schwartz, A. M.
- Corresponding author
- Schwartz, Anna M.
- ORCID
- Schwartz, Anna M.
- Venue
- Multiculturalism
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2022-05-30
- OpenAlex
- W4282979266
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- multiculturalism, multicultural interaction, immigrants, intergroup contact, social dominance orientation, identity theory, psychoanalytic theory, minority groups, multicultural communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review