Yalta Conference
Abstract
The Yalta Conference (4–11 February 1945) was the most important and, it transpired, the most controversial Allied summit of World War II. When the conference ended, Winston Churchill, Franklin Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin issued a statement proclaiming their utmost commitment to peacetime unity and to the establishment of longterm security for all states. After the conference, there was much talk about the ‘spirit of Yalta,’ and the Allied press lauded the meeting of the ‘Big Three’ as an historic turning point in Soviet–Western relations. But when the Cold War broke out in the mid-1940s, Churchill and especially Roosevelt came under fire for conceding too much to Stalin and for encouraging the Soviet dictator’s appetite for expansion. In subsequent years leftwing and right-wing critics of the Yalta agreements vied with each other in defining these agreements as either a great power carve-up of Europe into spheres of influence that blocked the path to revolution or as the cynical betrayal of the peoples of Eastern Europe to Stalinist tyranny.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
- Authors
- Roberts, G.
- Corresponding author
- Roberts, Geoff
- Venue
- Yalta Conference
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2025-03-31
- OpenAlex
- W4406760595
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Soviet and Russian History
- Keywords
- Yalta Conference, World War II, Big Three, Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Stalin, Soviet-Western relations, Cold War origins, spheres of influence, Eastern Europe, Soviet expansionism, Yalta Agreement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review