The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incorporating Nonbinary Gender into Inuit Archaeology: Oral Testimony and Material Inroads
Abstract
Incorporating Nonbinary Gender into Inuit Archaeology: Oral Testimony and Material Inroads explores gender diversity in precontact Inuit history. By combining evidence from interviews with re-examinations of previously excavated archaeological collections, it challenges binary narratives and creates an allowance for diverse narratives around gender to emerge. This work approaches a wide range of ethnographic and archaeological sources with a critical eye, opening up a dialogue between queer Indigenous studies, LGBTQ2+ Inuit, and archaeology in order to question normative colonial narratives about Indigenous pasts while providing concrete examples of how researchers can begin to let go of rigid assumptions. In this way the reader is encouraged to explore novel perspectives and think beyond boxes to understand gender complexity in precontact Inuit culture. This book has been written for a wide academic audience, particularly those interested in queer archaeologies, archaeologies of gender, decolonial archaeologies, and indigenous archaeologies, and oral history.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many archaeologists are applying different ways of knowing to interpret the past, such as Indigenous knowledge systems, Black feminist theory, and Queer theory.
“Many archaeologists are also applying different ways of knowing to interpret the past, such as Indigenous knowledge systems (Atalay 2006(Atalay , 2008)), Black feminist theory (Battle-Baptiste 2011), and Queer theory (Walley 2019).”
From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Walley 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kelvin, L., & Hodgetts, L. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.51270/44.1.1 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Walley, M.
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-11-27
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review