Sensory strangers
Abstract
Sensory experience is subject to considerable political and normative pressure, often felt, but rarely theorised. Taking as a starting point Simmel’s conceptualisation of the stranger, whose ‘position as a full-fledged member (of society) involves both being outside it and confronting it’, we propose neurodivergence as a form of Simmelian sensory stranger-hood, phenomenologically, spatially, and temporally situated as a tool for critical exploration of expressions of – and discourse around – cognitive normate sensory experience. We therefore consider neurodivergent experience less as an object of study than as a perspective. Here, the writers take the collective experiences of their own ‘bodyminds’ as a source of data. This chapter therefore consists of an auto-ethnographic project with a triple aim. First, we use this exploration to consider sensory normativity, and how this may affect the ways in which neurodivergent people are able to construct themselves and their identities. Second, we propose a reading within which the ‘sensory stranger’ provides a valuable epistemic asset whose potential exceeds the ‘particularity’ of neurodivergent experience. Finally, we are interested in considering the conditions and circumstances under which neurodiverse writing methods may be emancipatory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The individual autoethnographic narratives were produced in an iterative writing process in continuous responses to each other's writing.
“In addition, the individual narratives were being produced in an iterative writing process (cf.Jackson-Perry et al., 2020) in continuous responses to each other's writing.”
From Intensity and Variable Attention: Counter Narrating ADHD, from ADHD Deficits to ADHD Difference (2023) · cites this paper as Jackson-Perry et al., 2020
Cites
Articulating Sensory Sensitivity: From Bodies with Autism to Autistic Bodies
Belek, B. (2019) · Medical Anthropology · doi:10.1080/01459740.2018.1460750 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intensity and Variable Attention: Counter Narrating ADHD, from ADHD Deficits to ADHD Difference
Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, H., Hultman, L., Österborg Wiklund, S., Nygren, A., Storm, P., & Sandberg, G. (2023) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcad138 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jackson-Perry, D., Rosqvist, H. B., Annable, J. L., & Kourti, M.
- Affiliations
- Umeå University (SE)
- Venue
- Neurodiversity Studies
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2020-06-02
- Pages
- 125-140
- OpenAlex
- W3036680317
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
- Keywords
- Georg Simmel, neurodivergence, sensory experience, neurodivergent identity, autoethnography, emancipation, phenomenology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review