Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Class, Status, Party

Weber, Max·2018·The Inequality Reader

Abstract

The social order and the economic order are, of course, similarly related to the &s;legal order.&s; However, the social and the economic order are not identical. The economic order is for people merely the way in which economic goods and services are distributed and used. The social order is of course conditioned by the economic order to a high degree. Now, &s;classes,&s; &s;status groups,&s; and &s;parties&s; are phenomena of the distribution of power within a community. Since it is quite a general phenomenon one must mention here that the class antagonisms that are conditioned through the market situation are usually most bitter between those who actually and directly participate as opponents in price wars. But status honor need not necessarily be linked with a &s;class situation.&s; On the contrary, it normally stands in sharp opposition to the pretensions of sheer property. &s;Property&s; and &s;lack of property&s; are, therefore, the basic categories of all class situations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780429494468-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Weber, M.
Venue
The Inequality Reader
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2018-04-19
Pages
56-67
OpenAlex
W2465422781
Cited by
220
References
0
FWCI
12.64
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Class, Status, Party. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780429494468-7
The paper
Weber, M. (2018). Class, Status, Party. The Inequality Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494468-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.