The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) After Brain Injury
Abstract
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a third-wave cognitive behavioural therapy that is rooted in both pragmatic philosophical traditions and radical behaviourism. ACT views language as the ultimate source of clinical problems. The philosophical underpinnings of ACT would view that statement as not necessarily true but rather more worthy of functional analysis. ACT is compatible with elements of cognitive behavioural therapy, and physical relaxation interventions, used in other behavioural therapies, are also compatible with meta-cognitive interventions incorporated in cognitive rehabilitation, e.g., attention training/mindfulness. Great emphasis in the ACT model is placed on workability: avoiding being right and focusing on what works is liberating and provides clinical focus without being side-tracked by an absolute desire to be right. A consideration with ACT, and other forms of psychotherapy, when working with people after brain injury is whether the person can engage in talking therapy and remember the content.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As a result, the abstract becomes more concrete and implicit memory resources are engaged to support learning.
“As a result, the abstract becomes more concrete and implicit memory resources are engaged to support learning. 23”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy for people with acquired brain injury: Rationale and description of the BrainACT treatment. (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.
Carter, M. J. (2014) · Therapeutic Recreation Journal · Cited by 15,154
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rauwenhoff, J. C., Bol, Y., van Heugten, C. M., Batink, T., Geusgens, C. A., van den Hout, A. J., Smits, P., Verwegen, C. R., Visser, A., & Peeters, F. (2023) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/02692155231154124 · Cited by 19
“As a result, the abstract becomes more concrete and implicit memory resources are engaged to support learning.(23) The therapist actively models the acceptance and commitment therapy processes and participates together with the patient in the exercises as an equal.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Todd, D., & Smith, M.
- Venue
- Psychological Therapies in Acquired Brain Injury
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-12-06
- Pages
- 23-43
- OpenAlex
- W3004139776
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- acceptance and commitment therapy, brain injury, cognitive rehabilitation, radical behaviorism, pragmatic philosophy, mindfulness, attention training, relaxation intervention, workability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
