Cited by 0Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and PedagogyReading and Literacy Development

Week 6

Newton, Nicki·2020·Day-by-Day Math Thinking Routines in Third Grade

Abstract

This chapter is about a routine in which the teachers want their students to be focusing on the vocabulary. It advises them to encourage students to use the word bank and give students the designated part of the time to write everything they can about polygons and then share and then write again and finally share out with the class. The next day, the students have to look at the problem with their math partner and discuss what is incorrect and then figure out how they would fix it. They should be ready to come back and discuss it with the class. Students should discuss the string as a whole class. The emphasis should be on the relationships between the numbers. Getting students to match the story to the equation is so important because this is often where students struggle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003006442-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Authors
Newton, N.
Corresponding author
Newton, Nicki
Venue
Day-by-Day Math Thinking Routines in Third Grade
Published
2020-03-04
Pages
27-30
OpenAlex
W4244105326
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Eye on Education eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
vocabulary teaching, word bank, polygons, mathematical discourse, peer discussion, problem solving, number relationships, classroom routines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review