Carceral other and severing of people, place and land
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All of the issues of violence experienced by Indigenous peoples in residential schools, by police, through hyper-imprisonment and child removal, in hospitals, and in the contemporary education system are interlinked and outcomes of the carceral state.
“All of these issues are interlinked and outcomes of the carceral state-defined as the policing, monitoring, surveillance, criminalization and imprisonment of people, especially Indigenous and other racialized peoples.”
From Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science (2023) · cites this paper as Chartrand and Rougier, 2021
A decolonial approach to justice encompasses a relational logic rather than a colonial, oppositional logic.
“Chartrand and imprisoned Abenaki artist Niko Rougier (2021) explain that a decolonial approach to justice encompasses a relational logic rather than a colonial, oppositional logic.”
From Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science (2023) · cites this paper as Chartrand and Rougier, 2021
A relational logic rejects carceral operations that disrupt, sever and modify relationality-interconnections with people and all forms of life that are fundamental to many Indigenous peoples.
“A relational logic rejects carceral operations that disrupt, sever and modify relationality-interconnections with people and all forms of life that are fundamental to many Indigenous peoples.”
From Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science (2023) · cites this paper as Chartrand and Rougier, 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science
Mussell, L. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423923000288 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chartrand, V., & Rougier, N.
- ORCID
- Chartrand, Vicki
- Venue
- Contesting Carceral Logic
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2021-06-30
- Pages
- 22-35
- OpenAlex
- W3173521074
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Australian History and Society
- Keywords
- incarceration, land dispossession, carceral state, othering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
