Life Imprisonment as a Hallmark of Mass Incarceration
Abstract
This chapter presents the view that the expansion of life imprisonment was a tactic of mass incarceration and an integral part of the mentality that governed the era. Despite the key role, those serving the longest sentences have been excluded from recent legislative reforms because the corresponding crimes usually involve violence. Aggressive steps will need to be taken to recalibrate the system to one that responds to the most serious and violent crimes using principles of accountability combined with fairness, equity, and mercy. With these principles as the guiding light in reform, it is reasonable to foresee the era of mass incarceration fading into history.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The punitiveness of the US criminal legal system remains quite high.
“Life sentences (including life without parole, life with parole, and virtual life sentences) have increased, suggesting that the punitiveness of the US criminal legal system remains quite high (Nellis 2023).”
From The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System (2025) · cites this paper as Nellis 2023
Life sentences, including life without parole, life with parole, and virtual life sentences, have increased.
“Life sentences (including life without parole, life with parole, and virtual life sentences) have increased, suggesting that the punitiveness of the US criminal legal system remains quite high (Nellis 2023).”
From The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System (2025) · cites this paper as Nellis 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System
Wakefield, S., & Turney, K. (2025) · RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences · doi:10.7758/rsf.2025.11.3.04 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nellis, A.
- Corresponding author
- Nellis, Ashley
- ORCID
- Nellis, Ashley
- Venue
- Mass Incarceration in the 21st Century
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2023-08-03
- Pages
- 46-55
- OpenAlex
- W4385553570
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
- Keywords
- life imprisonment, mass incarceration, criminal justice reform, violent crime, sentencing policy, long-term prisoners, accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review