Cited by 1Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCriminal Law and Policy

Life Imprisonment as a Hallmark of Mass Incarceration

Nellis, Ashley·2023·Mass Incarceration in the 21st Century

Abstract

This chapter presents the view that the expansion of life imprisonment was a tactic of mass incarceration and an integral part of the mentality that governed the era. Despite the key role, those serving the longest sentences have been excluded from recent legislative reforms because the corresponding crimes usually involve violence. Aggressive steps will need to be taken to recalibrate the system to one that responds to the most serious and violent crimes using principles of accountability combined with fairness, equity, and mercy. With these principles as the guiding light in reform, it is reasonable to foresee the era of mass incarceration fading into history.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003274292-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nellis, A.
Corresponding author
Nellis, Ashley
Venue
Mass Incarceration in the 21st Century
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2023-08-03
Pages
46-55
OpenAlex
W4385553570
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
life imprisonment, mass incarceration, criminal justice reform, violent crime, sentencing policy, long-term prisoners, accountability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review