The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decolonisation and Participatory Design
Abstract
Decolonisation is increasingly a matter of concern in global design and technology research and practice. Decolonising discourses address the ongoing societal challenges of political, economic and racial justice rooted in coloniality and perpetuated within global Eurocentric structures and worldviews. In attempts to counter systemic biases, design and research communities call for diversity, equity and inclusion of the marginalised in collaborative design processes. This chapter presents contributions from Participatory Design and decolonising movements and how they engage across four core strands: the anticolonial, postcolonial, decolonial and the pluriversal. Each of the strands addresses attempts to reconcile different worlds, knowledges and epistemologies that can contribute towards new framings and directions for (de)colonialites in Participatory Design. Based on our survey of literature and research cases on Participatory Design and decoloniality, we demonstrate how researchers, designers and users in diverse contexts across the globe are working with and adapting modes, concepts and methodologies. They provide significant contributions at different levels of theory or practice and generate new trajectories for diverse and inclusive forms of knowledge production. The final section discusses the challenges and potentials raised by and across the strands and appeals for a relational agenda in Participatory Design. Contemporary debates on decolonisation in Participatory De…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing RAI frameworks highlight generic ethical principles but often fail to provide concrete methodologies that align with the sociocultural realities and knowledges of Indigenous communities.
“Existing RAI frameworks highlight generic ethical principles such as transparency, inclusivity, and fairness, but often fail to provide concrete methodologies that align with the sociocultural realities and knowledges of Indigenous communities [60, 77].”
From Designing Responsible AI with Indigenous Communities: Towards Participatory AI with ovaHimba and San People in Namibia (2026) · cites this paper as [77]
Decolonial approaches to AI design advocate for technologies that are co-created with African communities to address specific challenges, such as digital exclusion and resource constraints.
“Decolonial approaches to AI design advocate for technologies that are co-created with African communities to address specific challenges, such as digital exclusion and resource constraints [2, 23, 65, 66, 77].”
From Designing Responsible AI with Indigenous Communities: Towards Participatory AI with ovaHimba and San People in Namibia (2026) · cites this paper as [77]
A relational focus on learning and co-evolvement between community, the AI systems and wider ecological environment would be the basis of a strong and long-term trustworthy relation.
“This relational focus on learning and co-evolvement between community, the AI systems and wider ecological environment would be the basis of a strong and long-term trustworthy relation Till et al. [70, 71], Winschiers-Theophilus et al. [77].”
From Designing Responsible AI with Indigenous Communities: Towards Participatory AI with ovaHimba and San People in Namibia (2026) · cites this paper as Winschiers-Theophilus et al. [77]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indongo, N. N., Smith, R. C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Kandjengo, S., & Mbinge, U. (2026) · Proceedings of the 19th Participatory Design Conference 2026, Vol. 1: Full Papers · doi:10.1145/3796624.3796667 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Smith, R. C., van Amstel, F. M. C., & Botero, A.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Venue
- Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Participatory Design
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2024-12-19
- Pages
- 111-137
- OpenAlex
- W4405570138
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 77.50
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Routledge eBooks (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Keywords
- decolonization, participatory design, decoloniality, anti-colonialism, postcolonialism, coloniality, Eurocentrism, diversity, equity, and inclusion, epistemology, knowledge production, self-determination (international law), relational design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review