Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,464

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Personal communication

Cabano, Frank G., Müller, Stefan, Gelbrich, Katja·2024·Interfaith Marketing

Abstract

This chapter emphasizes the significant influence of personal communication, particularly recommendations from friends, on consumer decision-making, especially for high-involvement products. Research indicates that people trust personal recommendations more than commercial advertising. Religious individuals, particularly in Islamic cultures, prefer advice from their faith community over anonymous sources like mass media. Additionally, religious customers are more likely to share negative word-of-mouth experiences when they feel mistreated by a provider. They play active roles in communication networks, serving as both information seekers and providers, making them valuable targets for companies seeking to engage with their religious customer base effectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003506010-51

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,464

Metadata

Authors
Cabano, F. G., Müller, S., & Gelbrich, K.
Venue
Interfaith Marketing
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2024-10-29
Pages
249-250
OpenAlex
W4403868128
Cited by
1,464
References
0
FWCI
229.29
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personal communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781003506010-51
The paper
Cabano, F. G., Müller, S., & Gelbrich, K. (2024). Personal communication. Interfaith Marketing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003506010-51

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.