The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Abstract
The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI–II), by Beck, Steer, Ball, and Ranieri (1996) , is a self-report/interview questionnaire designed to quantify the amount of depression a person may be experiencing and its use is considered appropriate for a number of general client populations. Composed of 21 items, it assesses a wide range of depressive symptoms over a 2-week period. The original BDI instrument has gone through multiple revisions and today the BDI-II is arguably a gold standard of depression measurement. First mentioned in the literature in 1961, the most recent revision includes (1) the removal and replacement of 4 items that assess agitation, worthlessness, concentration difficulty, and loss of energy; (2) the time frame for responses was lengthened from 1 to 2 weeks; and (3) 2 items were changed to assess changes in appetite and sleep ( Hall et al., 2013 ). Each item of the BDI-II is rated along a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3 where the descriptors for each item vary and include such answers as self-dislike, which is scored as (0) I feel the same about myself as ever, (1) I have lost confidence in myself, (2) I am disappointed in myself, and (3) I dislike myself. Items are summed to produce a total score with higher scores representing more depressive symptoms. Administration time can be less than 10 minutes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Ibrahim, H. M., Carmody, T. J., Arnow, B., Klein, D. N., Markowitz, J. C., Ninan, P. T., Kornstein, S., Manber, R., et al. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01866-8 · Cited by 3,829
Occupational moral injury and mental health: systematic review and meta-analysis
Williamson, V., Stevelink, S. A. M., & Greenberg, N. (2018) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2018.55 · Cited by 375
Zucker, T. L., Samuelson, K. W., Muench, F., Greenberg, M. A., & Gevirtz, R. N. (2009) · Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback · doi:10.1007/s10484-009-9085-2 · Cited by 335
Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli: a meta-analytic review
Beard, C., Sawyer, A. T., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2012.01.002 · Cited by 291
Internet-based mindfulness treatment for anxiety disorders: a randomized controlled trial
Boettcher, J., Åström, V., Påhlsson, D., Schenström, O., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P. (2014) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.11.003 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Bortnick, K.
- Venue
- Occupational Therapy Assessments for Older Adults
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2024-05-28
- Pages
- 187-188
- OpenAlex
- W4399074339
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 197.60
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781003525288-77
- The paper
- Bortnick, K. (2024). Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Occupational Therapy Assessments for Older Adults. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003525288-77
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.