Cited by 291Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli: a meta-analytic review

Open access
Beard, Courtney, Sawyer, Alice T., Hofmann, Stefan G.·2012·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Attention bias modification (ABM) protocols aim to modify attentional biases underlying many forms of pathology. Our objective was to conduct an effect size analysis of ABM across a wide range of samples and psychological problems. We conducted a literature search using PubMed, PsycInfo, and author searches to identify randomized studies that examined the effects of ABM on attention and subjective experiences. We identified 37 studies (41 experiments) totaling 2,135 participants who were randomized to training toward neutral, positive, threat, or appetitive stimuli or to a control condition. The effect size estimate for changes in attentional bias was large for the neutral versus threat comparisons (g=1.06), neutral versus appetitive (g=1.41), and neutral versus control comparisons (g=0.80), and small for positive versus control (g=0.24). The effects of ABM on attention bias were moderated by stimulus type (words vs. pictures) and sample characteristics (healthy vs. high symptomatology). Effect sizes of ABM on subjective experiences ranged from 0.03 to 0.60 for postchallenge outcomes, -0.31 to 0.51 for posttreatment, and were moderated by number of training sessions, stimulus type, and stimulus orientation (top/bottom vs. left/right). Fail-safe N calculations suggested that the effect size estimates were robust for the training effects on attentional biases, but not for the effect on subjective experiences. ABM studies using threat stimuli produced significant effects on attention bias across comparison conditions, whereas appetitive stimuli produced changes in attention only when comparing appetitive versus neutral conditions. ABM has a moderate and robust effect on attention bias when using threat stimuli. Further studies are needed to determine whether these effects are also robust when using appetitive stimuli and for affecting subjective experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2012.01.002

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Heatherton TF Polivy J 1991 Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 895 910
  2. Mattick RP Clarke JC 1988 Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety Behaviour Research and Therapy 36 455 470 9670605
  3. Turner SM Beidel DC Dancu CV Stanley MA 1989 An empirically derived instrument to measure social fears and anxiety: The Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1 35 40

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beard, C., Sawyer, A. T., & Hofmann, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Beard, Courtney
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
724-740
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066042204
Cited by
291
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 1
FWCI
41.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH083330, MH078308., MH-081116, R01MH078308, R01MH081116)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
attentional bias modification, attentional bias, threat stimuli, appetitive stimuli, subjective experience, stimulus type, training sessions, stimulus orientation
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Attention, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review