The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses
Abstract
I must now expose more fully something which was briefly glimpsed in my analysis when I spoke of the necessity to renew the means of production if production is to be possible. That was a passing hint. Now I shall consider it for itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability
Roberts, J. (2009) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005 · Cited by 674
Racism in the News: A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reporting in Two Australian Newspapers
TEO, P. (2000) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926500011001002 · Cited by 649
Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California
Guthman, J. (2008) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.002 · Cited by 583
The Structure of Racism in Color-Blind, “Post-Racial” America
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2015) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764215586826 · Cited by 549
Crafting the neoliberal state: workfare, prisonfare and social insecurity*
Wacquant, L. (2013) · Why Prison? · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139344258.006 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- Althusser, L.
- Venue
- New Critical Writings in Political Sociology
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- Pages
- 299-340
- OpenAlex
- W117731346
- Cited by
- 2,028
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 511.57
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781003572923-18
- The paper
- Althusser, L. (2024). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. New Critical Writings in Political Sociology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003572923-18
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
