The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Educational Values and Cognitive Instruction
Abstract
This volume is a comprehensive guide to state-of-the-art research on thinking, cognitive instruction, social values, and reform. Cognitive instruction for at-risk students is discussed in great detail along with a thorough examination of the teaching of thinking skills from the viewpoint of educational values and school culture. The issues of thinking, learning, and cognitive instruction are linked to the educational reform movement from numerous perspectives. Specifically, the reader can better anticipate which aspects of research on thinking will conflict with existing paradigms and which aspects of schooling will be most resistant to change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Designing technology to support reflection
Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299633 · Cited by 342
Cognitive Load Theory for the Design of Medical Simulations
Fraser, K. L., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2015) · Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000097 · Cited by 306
Tiruneh, D. T., Verburgh, A., & Elen, J. (2014) · Higher Education Studies · doi:10.5539/hes.v4n1p1 · Cited by 255
Rodriguez, A. J. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21232 · Cited by 199
Toward a conceptual model of mentoring research: Integration with self-regulated learning
Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2013) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9233-3 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-12-16
- OpenAlex
- W1554338354
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Educational Values and Cognitive Instruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315044392
- The paper
- Educational Values and Cognitive Instruction. (2013). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315044392
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
