The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mathematical Thinking and Problem Solving
Abstract
Contents: Preface. J.L. Schwartz, The Role of Research in Reforming Mathematics Education: A Different Approach. M. Linn, R. Pea, A Discussion of Judah Schwartz's Chapter. B. Reznick, Some Thoughts on Writing for the Putnam. L.C. Larson, Comments on Bruce Reznick's Chapter. I. Olkin, A.H. Schoenfeld, A Discussion of Bruce Reznick's Chapter. A.H. Schoenfeld, Reflections on Doing and Teaching Mathematics. L. Henkin, J.L. Schwartz, A Discussion of Alan Schoenfeld's Chapter. J.J. Kaput, Democratizing Access to Calculus: New Routes to Old Roots. E. Dubinsky, Comments on James Kaput's Chapter. J. Confrey, E. Smith, Comments on James Kaput's Chapter. M. Cohen, A. Knoebel, D.S. Kurtz, D.J. Pengelley, Making Calculus Students Think with Research Projects. B.Y. White, R.G. Douglas, A Discussion of Cohen, Knoebel, Kurtz, and Pengelley's Chapter. E. Dubinsky, A Theory and Practice of Learning College Mathematics. R.G. Wenger, Comments on Ed Dubinsky's Chapter. A.A. diSessa, Comments on Ed Dubinsky's Chapter. S.S. Epp, The Role of Proof in Problem Solving. J.G. Greeno, Comments on Susanna Epp's Chapter. J. Addison, A Discussion of Susanna Epp's Chapter. T.A. Romberg, Classroom Instruction that Fosters Mathemical Thinking and Problem Solving: Connections Between Theory and Practice. G. Leinhardt, Comments of Thomas Romberg's Chapter. R.B. Davis, Comments on Thomas Romberg's Chapter. A.H. Schoenfeld, Epilogue.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“PSTs, especially at the elementary level, like the other college students that Povey and Burton (2003) studied, lack experiences that encourage them to rely on their internal mathematical authorities (Schoenfeld & Sloane, 2016).”
From Exercising Mathematical Authority: Three Cases of Preservice Teachers’ Algebraic Justifications (2019) · cites this paper as Schoenfeld & Sloane, 2016
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–409 of 409
Formalization of Neural Network Applications to Secure 3D Mobile Applications
Irolla, P. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/1521cb43zb1caz41a7z9142z6f2ae2fa219d
Taufik, T., Muhajir, M., & Hatip, A. (2026) · Journal of Social Work and Science Education · doi:10.52690/jswse.v7i2.1288
Beisly, A. H., & Ross, H. (2026) · Journal of Research in Childhood Education · doi:10.1080/02568543.2026.2658708
Sugilar, H., Herman, T., Darhim, & Miharja, D. (2026) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0338192
Ayuba, I., Biong'ahu, D., & Danlami, K. B. (2026) · Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.67203/jossme.2026.nzalj84c
Çalişkan, Ç., & Aktan, O. (2026) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2026.2716066
Ashurov, M. (2026) · Education & Pedagogy Journal · doi:10.23951/2782-2575-2026-3-22-33
AI-Mediated Formative Feedback in Open-Ended Mathematics Tasks
Fiorentino, M., & Montone, A. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31850-3_24
Purwosetiyono, F. D., Zuhri, M. S., & Huda, M. N. (2026) · Kognitif Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika · doi:10.51574/kognitif.v6i4.5634
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-05-06
- OpenAlex
- W1707818634
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History and Theory of Mathematics
- Keywords
- mathematical thinking, mathematical problem solving, mathematics education reform, calculus teaching, classroom teaching, Putnam competition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review