Autism: A New Introduction to Psychological Theory and Current Debate
Abstract
Based on Francesca Happé’s best-selling textbook, Autism: An Introduction to Psychological Theory, this completely new edition provides a concise overview of contemporary psychological theories about autism. Fletcher-Watson and Happé explore the relationship between theories of autism at psychological (cognitive), biological and behavioural levels, and consider their clinical and educational impact. The authors summarise what is known about the biology and behavioural features of autism, and provide concise but comprehensive accounts of all influential psychological models including ‘Theory of Mind’ (ToM) models, early social development models and alternative information processing models such as ‘weak central coherence’ theory. The book also discusses more recent attempts to understand autism, including the ‘Double Empathy Problem’ and Bayesian theories. In each case, the authors describe the theory, review the evidence and provide critical analysis of its value and impact. Recognising the multiplicity of theoretical views, and rapidly changing nature of autism research, each chapter considers current debates and major questions that remain for the future. Importantly, the book includes the voices of autistic people, including parents and practitioners, who were asked to provide commentaries on each chapter, helping to contextualise theory and research evidence with accounts of real-life experience. The book embraces neurodiversity whilst recognising the real needs of autis…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Widespread understandings of autism have firm roots within the medical paradigm.
“Widespread understandings of autism have firm roots within this medical paradigm (Evans, 2013; Fletcher‐Watson & Happé, 2019; Silberman, 2015).”
From Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science (2022) · cites this paper as Fletcher‐Watson & Happé, 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science
Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2022) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13534 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2020) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13176 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Self-citationDavis, R., & Crompton, C. J. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620958010 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Workplace adjustments for autistic employees: what is ‘reasonable?’
Petty, S., Tunstall, L., Richardson, H., & Eccles, N. (2023) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05413-x · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Jose, C., George-Zwicker, P., Tardif, L., Bouma, A., Pugsley, D., Pugsley, L., Bélanger, M., Gaudet, J., & Robichaud, M. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00233-2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fletcher-Watson, S., & Happé, F.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-01-24
- OpenAlex
- W4237621835
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, theory of mind, weak central coherence, early childhood social development, double empathy problem, Bayesian theory, neurodiversity, autistic perspectives, autism education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review