Cited by 22Mental Health and Patient InvolvementCommunity Health and DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

“We are the stakeholders with the most at stake”: scientific and autism community co-researchers reflect on their collaborative experience in the CONNECT project

Open access
Jose, Caroline, George-Zwicker, Patricia, Tardif, Louise, Bouma, Aaron, Pugsley, Darlene, Pugsley, Luke, Bélanger, Mathieu, Gaudet, Jeffrey +1 more·2020·Research Involvement and Engagement

Abstract

Background: Little research describes the everyday challenges and needs of autistic adults. In order to fill this data gap, the CONtiNuity of carE and support for autistiC adulTs (CONNECT) project set out to learn about the health and well-being of autistic adults as well as their service and support needs. To do so, CONNECT welcomed autistic adults and caregivers of autistic adults as members of the research team, alongside researchers, policy-makers, service providers and health professionals. Autistic adults were involved in every stage of the research project and participated in team meetings held several times a year as well as in numerous email exchanges. Methods: Two feedback questionnaires were designed for this study: one for the scientific co-researchers and one for the autism community co-researchers (the project’s “patient partners”). Although the surveys varied from one another, they probed respondents to provide critical and constructive comments on issues that were central to their engagement in CONNECT. Four scientific co-researchers and four autism community co-researchers filled out the questionnaires. A comparative analysis was carried out on the responses provided to the open- and closed-ended survey questions as well as on complimentary data collected from the team’s documents. Results: CONNECT was seen as a positive experience for both groups. Highlights included: helping tailor and design research and its relevant materials to better suit the needs of the autistic community; establishing relationships and creating long-lasting friendships with other autistic adults; gaining a better understanding of the research process; and forging new connections with regional, national and international stakeholders. Areas for improvement include: establishing clear roles, responsibilities and expectations from the start; outlining a strategy to address unforeseen changes in project leadership; and creating a platform allowing for the involvement and participation of a more representative sample of adults on the autism spectrum. Conclusions: While not without its challenges, CONNECT demonstrates that a collaborative multi-stakeholder approach engaging autistic adults can be an effective model for conducting research on adult autism. Autistic adults and their caregivers can make the research process more open and accessible and make its outputs more relevant, useful and meaningful to the wider autistic adult community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40900-020-00233-2

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This focus is in sharp contrast to the stated research priorities of community members - autistic people, their family members, educators, clinicians and other professionals - who have consistently called for research on areas that are of more immediate, practical concern or for basic science research that may be more straightforwardly translated into applications.

    “This focus is in sharp contrast to the stated research priorities of community members – autistic people, their family members, educators, clinicians and other professionals – who have consistently called for research on areas that are of more immediate, practical concern or for basic science research that may be more straightforwardly translated into applications (Frazier et al., 2018; Jose et al”

    From Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science (2022) · cites this paper as Jose et al., 2020

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Effective partnerships in autism research depend on strong relationships, including mutual trust, respect for each other's expertise and ways of being, and openness to learning from one another.

    “The few studies that have reflected upon lessons learnt from such partnerships have suggested that effective partnerships depend on strong relationships – that is, those in which there is mutual trust between partners, respect for each other’s expertise and ways of being, and an openness to learning from one another (Fletcher-Watson et al., 2019; Jose et al., 2020; Le Cunff et al., 2023; Maye et a”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Jose C George-Zwicker P Bouma A Tardif L Robichaud M Gaudet J The CONNECT project on adult autism: goals, results, and lessons learned 2019 Fredericton Presentation delivered at the Atlantic Provinces Autism Conference

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jose, C., George-Zwicker, P., Tardif, L., Bouma, A., Pugsley, D., Pugsley, L., Bélanger, M., Gaudet, J., & Robichaud, M.
Affiliations
  • Université de Moncton (CA)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Corresponding author
Robichaud, Marc
Venue
Research Involvement and Engagement
Published
2020-09-27
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
58-58
ISSN
2056-7529 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089139100
Cited by
22
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Involvement and Engagement (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit
  • Consortium national de formation en santé
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
autistic adults, co-research, patient and public involvement, multi-stakeholder collaboration, CONNECT project, caregiver involvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review