The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Conflict Tactics Scales and Its Critics: An Evaluation and New Data on Validity and Reliability
Abstract
The first study reporting data on intrafamily physical violence obtained by means of the Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS) was published in 1973. One approach taken to investigate the concurrent validity of the CTS has been to examine the level of agreement between CTS scores as reported by more than one family member. The importance of viewing couple agreement as an indication of the validity of the CTS as a measure of spouse abuse is stressed by Edelson and Brygger. The chapter reviews the evidence on factor structure, reliability, and validity. While the research indicates that social desirability presents little threat to the validity of the CTS, most of the agreement studies reviewed found large discrepancies between the reports of violence given by husbands and by wives. Concurrent validity is estimated by the degree to which the new instrument is related to other presumably valid instruments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review
Archer, J. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651 · Cited by 2,507
Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis
Golding, J. M. (1999) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1023/a:1022079418229 · Cited by 1,788
Childhood abuse and lifetime psychopathology in a community sample
MacMillan, H. L., Fleming, J. E., Streiner, D. L., Lin, E., Boyle, M. H., Jamieson, E., Duku, E. K., Walsh, C. A., Wong, M. Y.-Y., & Beardslee, W. R. (2001) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11.1878 · Cited by 1,035
The Myth of Sexual Symmetry in Marital Violence
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.1992.39.1.03x0064l · Cited by 965
A Short Form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and Typologies for Severity and Mutuality
Straus, M. A., & Douglas, E. M. (2004) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/088667004780927800 · Cited by 891
Self-citation
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Conflict Tactics Scales and Its Critics: An Evaluation and New Data on Validity and Reliability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315126401-5
- The paper
- Straus, M. A. (2017). The Conflict Tactics Scales and Its Critics: An Evaluation and New Data on Validity and Reliability. Physical Violence in American Families. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315126401-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
