Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 502

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Seed-Eaters: A New Model of Hominid Differentiation Based on a Baboon Analogy

Jolly, C. J.·2017·Primate Evolution and Human Origins

Abstract

This article is an attempt to reopen the problem of origins by examining critically some of the existing models of hominid differentiation, and to suggest a new one based on a fresh approach. Perhaps recognising this, adherents of the "predatory chimpanzee" model tend to situate the hominidpongid divergence in the late Pliocene, and regard all known fossils of basal Pleistocene Hominidae as representative of a short-lived transitional phase of imperfect hunting adaptation. While none of the previous models of hominid differentiation is without plausibility, none is very convincing. While there is little evidence for catastrophic desiccation in the tropics of the kind demanded by some models of hominid differentiation, there are indications that a trend towards seasonality persisted through the Tertiary, especially in Africa. A medium-sized Dryopithecus of the Miocene is a reasonable starting-point for hominid differentiation, and increased seasonality in the Middle-to-Upper Miocene and Lower Pliocene makes it likely that Phase I differentiation began at that time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315127408-48

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 502

Metadata

Authors
Jolly, C. J.
Venue
Primate Evolution and Human Origins
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2017-09-08
Pages
323-332
OpenAlex
W2282070633
Cited by
502
References
0
FWCI
93.61
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Seed-Eaters: A New Model of Hominid Differentiation Based on a Baboon Analogy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315127408-48
The paper
Jolly, C. J. (2017). The Seed-Eaters: A New Model of Hominid Differentiation Based on a Baboon Analogy. Primate Evolution and Human Origins. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127408-48

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.