The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Philosophical Perspectives on Ruins, Monuments, and Memorials
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The immortalization of the wreck for human posterity denies the wreck the possibility of decaying into the food chain or returning to the muddy waters.
“Furthermore, the immortalization of the wreck for human posterity denies the wreck the possibility of decaying into the food chain, or otherwise returning to the muddy waters from whence all things came [38].”
From What Is There to Do If You Find an Old Indian Canoe? Anti-Colonialism in Maritime Archaeology (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
Because there is a transference of the human body onto the form of the ship, we tend to project our own anxieties of decay and death onto the wrecked ship.
“In psychological terms, because there is a transference of the human body onto the form of the ship, we tend to project our own anxieties of decay and death onto the form of the wrecked ship [11,38].”
From What Is There to Do If You Find an Old Indian Canoe? Anti-Colonialism in Maritime Archaeology (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
None of the assumptions about the future that preservationism rests on is safe or certain.
“However, as it looks from the Anthropocene crow's nest (Figure 1) [36] (fig.1), none of these assumptions about the future is safe, let alone certain [37].”
From What Is There to Do If You Find an Old Indian Canoe? Anti-Colonialism in Maritime Archaeology (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What Is There to Do If You Find an Old Indian Canoe? Anti-Colonialism in Maritime Archaeology
Rich, S. A., Sievers-Cail, C., & Patterson, K. (2022) · Heritage · doi:10.3390/heritage5040191 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-07-15
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
