The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extractivisms
Abstract
Extractivism in its diverse forms is presented as an indispensable means of promoting development, but at the same time it is the object of growing questioning and resistance by citizens, popular sector organizations and social movements for its negative impacts. Extractivisms promote and need a certain type of state that is functional to the mode of appropriation of natural resources. In conservative administrations this is expressed by well-known situations, such as subordination to transnational corporations, deregulation of investments and exports. While all South American extractivisms are implanted under formally democratic regimes, they promote a political style that is directed toward delegative democracy, and within it toward hyper-presidentialism. Extractivisms maintain a remarkable permanence. It can be argued that they have been present since colonial times, and that in their most recent expansion have contributed to consolidate conventional ideas about development as growth and Nature as a basket of natural resources to be exploited.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The imperialist regulation of the international division of labor only enters obliquely, through a discussion of “globalization” (Gudynas, 2018, p. 66) or “accumulation by dispossession” (Lander, 2013, pp. 92-94), drawing on David Harvey to erase “the structured nature of the centre-periphery contradiction in historical capitalism” (Moyo et al., 2012, p. 88).”
From Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet (2023) · cites this paper as Gudynas, 2018, p. 66
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet
Ajl, M. (2023) · Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1177/22779760221145232 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Gudynas, E.
- Venue
- Reframing Latin American Development
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-04-09
- Pages
- 61-76
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review