Cited by 99

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extractivisms

Gudynas, Eduardo·2018·Reframing Latin American Development

Abstract

Extractivism in its diverse forms is presented as an indispensable means of promoting development, but at the same time it is the object of growing questioning and resistance by citizens, popular sector organizations and social movements for its negative impacts. Extractivisms promote and need a certain type of state that is functional to the mode of appropriation of natural resources. In conservative administrations this is expressed by well-known situations, such as subordination to transnational corporations, deregulation of investments and exports. While all South American extractivisms are implanted under formally democratic regimes, they promote a political style that is directed toward delegative democracy, and within it toward hyper-presidentialism. Extractivisms maintain a remarkable permanence. It can be argued that they have been present since colonial times, and that in their most recent expansion have contributed to consolidate conventional ideas about development as growth and Nature as a basket of natural resources to be exploited.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315170084-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 99

Metadata

Authors
Gudynas, E.
Venue
Reframing Latin American Development
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2018-04-09
Pages
61-76
Cited by
99
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review