Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,097

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Reflective Practitioner

Knapton, Helena, Gurjee, Jamila·2019·Teaching Business, Economics and Enterprise 14–19

Abstract

The newly formed Chartered College of Teaching seeks to provide accreditation for the development of excellence in teaching through the use of evidence-based approaches. There are different ways in which teachers can investigate and develop their own practice. This chapter seeks to provide a simple introduction to some approaches that will support teachers&s; continuing development within this profession. It deals with the place of systematic evaluation and the different ways that this can be undertaken. Informal or formal development or investigation of teaching is undertaken ethical considerations need to be accounted for. This is particularly the case in schools as it involves learners who are considered to be vulnerable participants. A more structured and more meaningful form of peer review is when colleagues work together on a particular aspect of practice. Sometimes management are closely involved with the development of peer review - choosing who a teacher works with and what the focus of peer review is.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315171944-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,097

Metadata

Authors
Knapton, H., & Gurjee, J.
Venue
Teaching Business, Economics and Enterprise 14–19
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2019-10-02
Pages
138-154
OpenAlex
W2991296629
Cited by
1,097
References
0
FWCI
221.78
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Reflective Practitioner. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315171944-9
The paper
Knapton, H., & Gurjee, J. (2019). The Reflective Practitioner. Teaching Business, Economics and Enterprise 14–19. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315171944-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.