The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources
Abstract
This chapter considers the claims of equality of welfare as an interpretation of treating people as equals, and considers the competing claims of equality of resources. It argues that an equal division of resources presupposes an economic market of some form, mainly as an analytical device but also, to a certain extent, as an actual political institution. The market character of the auction is not simply a convenient or ad hoc device for resolving technical problems that arise for equality of resources in very simple exercises like our desert island case. Insurance, so far as it is available, provides a link between brute and option luck, because the decision to buy or reject catastrophe insurance is a calculated gamble. The premium of someone who barely earns the average coverage amount would be less than the premium the insurance market would have fixed on a flat-rate basis, though the premium of someone who earns much more would be much greater.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Justifying the capabilities approach to justice
Anderson, E. (2010) · Measuring Justice · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810916.004 · Cited by 194
Distributive Justice and the Value of Information: A (Broadly) Rawlsian Approach
Van Den Hoven, J., & Rooksby, E. (2008) · Information Technology and Moral Philosophy · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511498725.019 · Cited by 66
Central banking and inequalities: Taking off the blinders
Fontan, C., Claveau, F., & Dietsch, P. (2016) · Politics, Philosophy & Economics · doi:10.1177/1470594x16651056 · Cited by 62
Fair navigation planning: A resource for characterizing and designing fairness in mobile robots
Brandão, M., Jirotka, M., Webb, H., & Luff, P. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2020.103259 · Cited by 35
Insurance Discrimination and Fairness in Machine Learning: An Ethical Analysis
Loi, M., & Christen, M. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3438823 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Dworkin, R.
- Venue
- The Notion of Equality
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-05-08
- Pages
- 143-205
- OpenAlex
- W164240929
- Cited by
- 2,125
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 815.40
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315199795-7
- The paper
- Dworkin, R. (2018). What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. The Notion of Equality. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315199795-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.