The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood
Abstract
Intimacy is the sharing of information about one&s;s actions, beliefs or emotions, which one does not share with all, and which one has the right not to share with anyone. Privacy creates the moral capital which we spend in friendship and love. The relationship between privacy and personhood is a twofold one. First, the social ritual of privacy seems to be an essential ingredient in the process by which "persons" are created out of prepersonal infants. Secondly, the social ritual of privacy confirms, and demonstrates respect for, the personhood of already developed persons. The right to privacy, then, protects the individual&s;s interest in becoming, being, and remaining a person. It is thus a right which all human individuals possess–even those in solitary confinement. That social practices which penetrate "the private reserve of the individual" are effective means to mortify the inmate&s;s self–that is, literally, to kill it off–suggests that privacy is essential to the creation and maintenance of selves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Information Privacy Research: an Interdisciplinary Review1
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409970 · Cited by 2,013
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy
Floridi, L. (2006) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9121-3 · Cited by 160
Self-exposure and exposure of the self: informational privacy and the presentation of identity
Shoemaker, D. W. (2010) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-009-9186-x · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Reiman, J. H.
- Venue
- Privacy
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-09-08
- Pages
- 23-41
- OpenAlex
- W2237538561
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.45
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315246024-3
- The paper
- Reiman, J. H. (2017). Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood. Privacy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315246024-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.