The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human resource planning
Abstract
People are an organization&s;s most valuable resource, yet salaries and associated overheads such as superannuation are often the most expensive component of the budget. Managed appropriately, an organization&s;s workforce is its lifeblood. Managed inappropriately, the workforce becomes an expensive commitment that leads to few rewards but many problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268 · Cited by 4,623
KRISTOF‐BROWN, A. L., ZIMMERMAN, R. D., & JOHNSON, E. C. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x · Cited by 4,082
Developmental coaching for high school teachers: Executive coaching goes to school.
Grant, A. M., Green, L. S., & Rynsaardt, J. (2010) · Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research · doi:10.1037/a0019212 · Cited by 167
HRM – A Service Perspective: Towards a Customer‐focused HRM
Schneider, B. (1994) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564239410051911 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Venue
- Effective Library and Information Centre Management
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-03-02
- Pages
- 73-94
- OpenAlex
- W1589817015
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.75
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human resource planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315256894-16
- The paper
- Human resource planning. (2017). Effective Library and Information Centre Management. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315256894-16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
