The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Academic Dishonesty
Abstract
Research and media reports have established the continued pervasiveness of academic dishonesty among students on America&s;s college campuses. While some colleges have responded with academic integrity classes and increased efforts to convince reluctant faculty members to report student cheaters, there is a renewed interest in the concept of "community" as an effective foundation for campus governance. Academic integrity policies can differ significantly in their content and in the manner in which they are communicated. As a result, important differences are likely to be found in the understanding and acceptance of these policies on different campuses. The hypotheses were tested using a sample of 6,096 students from thirty-one US colleges and universities. Initial sample selection focused on thirty-three institutions that had participated in a conference on honor systems held at Princeton University in 1988, and fourteen institutions with honor codes ultimately indicated a willingness to participate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control
Zimring, F., & Hawkins, G. (1973) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1227719 · Cited by 638
Cited by
The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633 · Cited by 2,875
Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1103_2 · Cited by 1,379
Self-citationThe Ethical Context in Organizations: Influences on Employee Attitudes and Behaviors
Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3857431 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationIn Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons
PARK, C. (2003) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930301677 · Cited by 892
Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1024954224675 · Cited by 830
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K.
- Venue
- Academic Ethics
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-05-15
- Pages
- 545-561
- OpenAlex
- W2036491738
- Cited by
- 730
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 176.57
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Academic Dishonesty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315263465-43
- The paper
- McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2017). Academic Dishonesty. Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315263465-43
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.