The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
eHealth Research, Theory and Development: A Multidisciplinary Approach
Abstract
This paper evaluates the potential of semantic technologies to facilitate building material circulation in the construction industry within the Circular Economy (CE) context. It suggests building material passports as a data source for the materials to be circulated and then integrates them by means of Linked Data. A common language is proposed to combine and re-use the material data in the CE with the creation of two ontologies: Circular Exchange Ontology (CEO) and the Circular Materials and Activities Ontology (CAMO).The ontologies annotate materials under a CE classification scheme and describe the elements required for material exchange to occur: actors, the activities they perform and the referents of these activities (resources, products, tools and waste). An evaluation of the ontologies is made by means of use case-driven SPARQL queries. Further, a wide-scale evaluation addresses how a decentralized data ecosystem can enable users to publish information and dynamically interact with different repositories to exchange materials. Results indicate that these ontologies can foster a circulation medium between diverse construction industry resources. Future work contemplates validation of both ontologies in a real-world-setting with computer scientists and companies in the construction sector in the Benelux area.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The CeHRes Roadmap is a much-used structured framework for the development of eHealth technologies [5,16].”
From Methods for Human-Centered eHealth Development: Narrative Scoping Review (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cites
Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology
Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2002) · Cited by 4,622
Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A., & Koh, S. C. L. (2015) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015 · Cited by 1,684
The history and current applications of the circular economy concept
Winans, K. S., Kendall, A. M., & Deng, H. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.123 · Cited by 1,212
Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry
Nasir, M. H. A., Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Koh, S. C. L., & Yamoah, F. A. (2016) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.008 · Cited by 506
The NeOn Methodology for Ontology Engineering
Suárez-Figueroa, M. C., Gómez-Pérez, A., & Fernández‐López, M. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_2 · Cited by 437
GoodRelations: An Ontology for Describing Products and Services Offers on the Web
Hepp, M. F. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87696-0_29 · Cited by 399
Nobre, G. C., & Tavares, E. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2281-6 · Cited by 375
Product biographies in servitization and the circular economy
Spring, M., & Araújo, L. (2016) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.07.001 · Cited by 230
Merrild, H., Jensen, K. G., & Sommer, J. (2016) · Cited by 46
Circular economy in the Dutch construction sector : A perspective for the market and government
Schut, E., Crielaard, M., & Mesman, M. (2016) · Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) · Cited by 32
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kouijzer, M. M. T. E., Kip, H., Bouman, Y. H. A., & Kelders, S. M. (2023) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-023-00442-2 · Cited by 336
Self-citationSommers-Spijkerman, M., Austin, J., Bohlmeijer, E., & Pots, W. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/28168 · Cited by 179
Asbjørnsen, R. A., Smedsrød, M. L., Solberg Nes, L., Wentzel, J., Varsi, C., Hjelmesæth, J., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14265 · Cited by 150
Palacholla, R. S., Fischer, N., Coleman, A., Agboola, S., Kirley, K., Felsted, J., Katz, C., Lloyd, S., & Jethwani, K. (2019) · JMIR Cardio · doi:10.2196/11951 · Cited by 127
Developing Embodied Conversational Agents for Coaching People in a Healthy Lifestyle: Scoping Review
Kramer, L. L., ter Stal, S., Mulder, B. C., de Vet, E., & van Velsen, L. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14058 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- van Gemert-Pijnen, L. J. E. W. C., Kelders, S. M., Kip, H., & Sanderman, R.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-05-23
- OpenAlex
- W2795154182
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- circular economy, building materials, material circulation, semantic technologies, linked data, ontology (information science), construction industry, SPARQL queries, waste management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
