Cited by 375Sustainable Supply Chain Managementscientometrics and bibliometrics researchEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Scientific literature analysis on big data and internet of things applications on circular economy: A bibliometric study

Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan, Tavares, Elaine·2017·Scientometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-017-2281-6

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nobre, G. C., & Tavares, E.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan
  • Tavares, Elaine
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2017-02-07
Volume
111
Issue
1
Pages
463-492
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W2586281947
Cited by
375
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 7
FWCI
58.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
circular economy, big data, Internet of Things, research trends, research gaps, natural resource scarcity, greenhouse gas emissions, industry initiatives, technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review