Compassionate leadership for compassionate health care
Abstract
This chapter addresses the question of what is meant by compassion in organisations and proposes a model of compassionate leadership. In the best-performing health care organisations, all leaders make it clear that high-quality, compassionate care is the purpose and priority of the organization. Working in teams is vital for health care quality but there is also good evidence that supportive teams, with good team leadership, have significantly lower levels of stress than dysfunctional or pseudo teams in health care. The purposeful, visible distribution of leadership responsibility onto the shoulders of every person in the organisation is vital for creating the type of collective leadership that will nurture the right culture for health care. Caring for the health of others requires compassion – attending, understanding, empathising and helping. Research in the NHS has shown that learning and innovation, in the context of psychological safety rather than a blame culture, is vital for nurturing cultures of high-quality, continually improving and compassionate care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies within other organisational cultures have characterised compassionate leaders as: attending to and listening with interest; seeking to understand challenges; empathising; and acting to remove obstacles and obtain resources where they are needed.
“Studies within other organisational cultures have characterised compassionate leaders as: attending to and listening with interest; seeking to understand challenges; empathising; and acting to remove obstacles and obtain resources where they are needed (West and Chowla, 2017).”
From Compassionate pedagogy for neurodiversity in higher education: A conceptual analysis (2023) · cites this paper as West and Chowla, 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- West, M. A., & Chowla, R.
- Venue
- Compassion
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-04-21
- Pages
- 237-257
- OpenAlex
- W2903680204
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 18.09
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Keywords
- compassionate leadership, quality of care, team leadership, shared leadership, organizational culture, psychological safety, blame culture, learning and innovation, occupational stress, National Health Service
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review