The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coming to Terms with Chance: Engaging Rational Discrimination and Cumulative Disadvantage
Abstract
The application of probability and statistics to an ever-widening number of life-decisions serves to reproduce, reinforce, and widen disparities in the quality of life that different groups of people can enjoy. As a critical technology assessment, the ways in which bad luck early in life increase the probability that hardship and loss will accumulate across the life course are illustrated. Analysis shows the ways in which individual decisions, informed by statistical models, shape the opportunities people face in both market and non-market environments. Ultimately, this book challenges the actuarial logic and instrumental rationalism that drives public policy and emphasizes the role that the mass media play in justifying its expanded use. Although its arguments and examples take as their primary emphasis the ways in which these decision systems affect the life chances of African-Americans, the findings are also applicable to a broad range of groups burdened by discrimination.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“when variables used in machine learning models to make predictions about or classify people -such as quali fi cations, work history, or criminal record -are already shaped by structural discrimination (Custers et al . 2012; Barocas & Selbst 2016; Gandy 2016).”
From Human Judgment in algorithmic loops: Individual justice and automated decision‐making (2022) · cites this paper as Gandy 2016
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Burrell, J., & Fourcade, M. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090820-020800 · Cited by 562
Algorithmic Profiling of Job Seekers in Austria: How Austerity Politics Are Made Effective
Allhutter, D., Cech, F., Fischer, F., Grill, G., & Mager, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2020.00005 · Cited by 257
Human Judgment in algorithmic loops: Individual justice and automated decision‐making
Binns, R. (2022) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12358 · Cited by 134
POTs: protective optimization technologies
Kulynych, B., Overdorf, R., Troncoso, C., & Gürses, S. F. (2020) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372853 · Cited by 88
Epstein, D., & Quinn, K. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120916853 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Gandy, O. H.
- Corresponding author
- Gandy, Oscar H.
- ORCID
- Gandy, Oscar H.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-05-23
- OpenAlex
- W4241465173
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
- Keywords
- chance, public policy, mass media, discrimination, African Americans, life chances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coming to Terms with Chance: Engaging Rational Discrimination and Cumulative Disadvantage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315572758
- The paper
- Gandy, O. H. (2016). Coming to Terms with Chance: Engaging Rational Discrimination and Cumulative Disadvantage. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315572758