Cited by 74Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime, Deviance, and Social Control

The Routledge International Handbook on Fear of Crime

Chas Critcher·2017·Routledge eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315651781

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research indicates that the combination of outsized fear of crime and exposure to information on racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal legal system tends to reduce support for criminal legal system reform.

    “Moreover, research indicates that the combination of outsized fear of crime and exposure to information on racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal legal system tends to reduce support for criminal legal system reform (Beckett 2018;Gottschalk 2006;M. Lee and Mythen 2017;Murakawa 2019).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Critcher, C.
Corresponding author
Chas Critcher
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2017-12-01
OpenAlex
W2907280686
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6
FWCI
6.63
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Keywords
fear of crime, crime perception, victimization, public attitudes toward crime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review