The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identity and Membership
Abstract
Researchers studying identity belong to a wide diversity of disciplines, ranging from anthropology, psychology, sociology, history and literature through to linguistics. Within the latter field, identity is studied by discourse analysts, interactional sociolinguists, conversation analysts and discursive psychologists. Identity is often also explicitly related to membership, as the following definition by Kroskrity illustrates. Social identity theory also recognises that though each individual is a member of a number of different social groups, these may differ in salience. Approaches to identity, such as discourse analysis, conversation analysis, discursive psychology and interactional sociolinguistics, tend to focus on naturally occurring oral data that are recorded and then transcribed. This chapter selects one interview with a thirty-three-year-old secondary schoolteacher (IE) who obtained a master's degree in French and Spanish. It discusses an excerpt from the interview in which the interviewer (IR) probes for situations in which the interviewee was the victim of racism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This idea challenges the definition of identity as singular and static (Van De Mieroop, 2017).”
From The Use of Outsider Witness Practice in Narrative Therapy in Group Counseling: A Mixed Method Study (2026) · cites this paper as Van De Mieroop, 2017
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Use of Outsider Witness Practice in Narrative Therapy in Group Counseling: A Mixed Method Study
Kurtuluş, E., & Düşünceli, B. (2026) · Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi · doi:10.17066/tpdrd.1950394
Metadata
- Authors
- Van De Mieroop, D.
- Venue
- The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-01-20
- Pages
- 184-196
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review