Cited by 935Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation, Philosophy, and SocietyTeacher Professional Development and Motivation

Teacher Agency

Priestley, Mark, Biesta, Gert, Robinson, Sarah·2015·Flip the System

Abstract

Teacher Agency - 1 - What Is It and Why Does It Matter?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315678573-15

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When decision-making power is granted, it usually aligns with external policy objectives.

    “When granted, decision-making power usually aligns with external policy objectives (Priestley et al. 2015).”
  • Teachers often implement policies devised by others, with their expertise overlooked and their learning constrained, affecting their agency.

    “Consequently, teachers often implement policies devised by others, with their expertise overlooked and their learning constrained (Smith 2017), affecting their agency (Campbell 2015, Priestley et al. 2015).”
  • Studies employing ecological frameworks for curriculum work have generated knowledge about how educators approach curriculum creation in their immediate settings, showing multifaceted relationships between teacher knowledge, professional values, and contextual influences.

    “Studies employing ecological frameworks for curriculum work (Priestley et al. 2021; Priestley, Biesta, and Robinson 2015) have generated important knowledge about how educators approach curriculum creation in their immediate settings, demonstrating the multifaceted relationships between teacher knowledge, professional values, and contex­ tual influences.”

    From A prescriptive continuum analytical framework for measuring school curriculum structure (2026) · cites this paper as Priestley, Biesta, and Robinson 2015

  • Priestley et al. (2015) summarise three contrasting ways of articulating teacher agency: agency as a variable, agency as capacity and agency as a phenomenon.

    “Priestley et al. (2015) summarise three contrasting ways of articulating teacher agency: agency as a variable, agency as capacity and agency as a phenomenon (p.20).”
  • Teacher agency is understood as being dependent on conditions and qualities, including cultural, material, relational resources and people's ability to use them.

    “Secondly, teacher agency is understood as being dependent on conditions and qualities, including cultural, material, relational resources and people's ability to use them.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S.
Venue
Flip the System
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2015-06-26
Pages
134-148
OpenAlex
W346191509
Cited by
935
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 227 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1
FWCI
74.25
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
Keywords
teacher agency, teacher autonomy, teacher empowerment, teacher voice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review