The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Disability Studies Reader
Open accessAbstract
The fifth edition of The Disability Studies Reader addresses the post-identity theoretical landscape by emphasizing questions of interdependency and independence, the human-animal relationship, and issues around the construction or materiality of gender, the body, and sexuality. Selections explore the underlying biases of medical and scientific experiments and explode the binary of the sound and the diseased mind. The collection addresses physical disabilities, but as always investigates issues around pain, mental disability, and invisible disabilities as well. Featuring a new generation of scholars who are dealing with the most current issues, the fifth edition continues the Reader’s tradition of remaining timely, urgent, and critical.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion.
Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.187 · Cited by 1,424
Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability
Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.730511 · Cited by 1,272
Decolonising disability: Thinking and acting globally
Meekosha, H. (2011) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.602860 · Cited by 653
Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse
Hoffmann, A. L. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1573912 · Cited by 535
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2020) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13176 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-10-19
- OpenAlex
- W1553527595
- Cited by
- 1,653
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 164.26
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Disability Studies Reader. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315680668
- The paper
- The Disability Studies Reader. (2016). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315680668
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
