Cited by 1,424Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion.

Kurzban, Robert, Leary, Mark R.·2001·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

A reconceptualization of stigma is presented that changes the emphasis from the devaluation of an individual's identity to the process by which individuals who satisfy certain criteria come to be excluded from various kinds of social interactions. The authors propose that phenomena currently placed under the general rubric of stigma involve a set of distinct psychological systems designed by natural selection to solve specific problems associated with sociality. In particular, the authors suggest that human beings possess cognitive adaptations designed to cause them to avoid poor social exchange partners, join cooperative groups (for purposes of between-group competition and exploitation), and avoid contact with those who are differentially likely to carry communicable pathogens. The evolutionary view contributes to the current conceptualization of stigma by providing an account of the ultimate function of stigmatization and helping to explain its consensual nature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.187

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stigmatization and prejudice resulting in marginalization and isolation, or ostracism and periods of quarantining, are adaptations for reducing contact with parasites present within the in-group.

    “We agree with Freeland (1976) and Kurzban and Leary (2001) in predicting that stigmatization and prejudice resulting in marginalization and isolation, or ostracism and periods of quarantining, are adaptations for this purpose.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2001-03
Volume
127
Issue
2
Pages
187-208
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2023726302
Cited by
1,424
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 116 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 85
FWCI
61.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
stigma, social exclusion, social exchange, cooperation, between-group competition, cognitive adaptation, sociality, natural selection
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Biological Evolution, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Social Behavior, Social Isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review