Cited by 846Multilingual Education and PolicySecond Language Learning and TeachingEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Translanguaging with Multilingual Students

·2016·Routledge eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315695242

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • English-only policies do not benefit EBs; EBs learn better if their home language is valued and utilized as a resource using translanguaging and culturally and linguistically responsive pedagogies.

    “However, the myth that English-only policies benefit EBs has been contested by several researchers (August et al., 2011; Menken, 2013); in fact, EBs learn better if their home language is valued and utilized as a resource using translanguaging (García & Kleyn, 2016; García & Wei, 2014) and culturally and linguistically responsive pedagogies (Gay, 2018; Villegas & Lucas, 2002).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2016-06-10
OpenAlex
W3000051423
Cited by
846
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 104 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 8
FWCI
37.56
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Keywords
translanguaging, multilingual learners, multilingual education, language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review