The Do-It-Your(Self)
Abstract
This chapter concentrates on &s;do-it-yourself&s; (DIY) links to self-actualization in three related though distinguishable historical milieus. The first historical milieu is the early post-war period of 1950s North America, when the DIY phenomenon as we know it first emerged, and was later exported to Britain. The second historical milieu relates to the 1960s and 1970s countercultural movement in North America, when radicalized how-to publications were targeted at an alternative "do-it-yourself-obsessed generation". The third millennium relates to the discourses and practices of DIY urbanism and the allied &s;maker movement&s;; both of these forms of DIY remain closely associated with North America but have spread elsewhere through online global networks. The countercultural movement of the 1960s and 1970s saw the extension of the DIY ethic into the experimental, dispersed communes of the mostly rural North America. This geographical relocation of DIY was accompanied by a parallel shift in its social focus from the conservative suburban family to the liberated countercultural collective.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The DIY movement has supported systems of production to happen in the world that would otherwise only be possible through a capitalist mode of production.
“The DIY movement has supported systems of production to happen in the world that would otherwise only be possible through a capitalist mode of production [20], often aligned with counterculture ideals [36].”
From DIY mass timber: development of low-tech and low-cost structural mass timber manufacturing to support forest utilization in California (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Cites
Ant Farm (1970) Inflatocookbook, San Francisco, CA: Ant Farm, November 10–December 10.
(n.d.)
Unresolved
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 1 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mayencourt, P., & Swagemakers, J. (2025) · Architecture, Structures and Construction · doi:10.1007/s44150-025-00147-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smith, C.
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Cathy
- Venue
- The Routledge Companion to Architecture and Social Engagement
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-05-11
- Pages
- 243-256
- OpenAlex
- W2912188424
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Crafts, Textile, and Design
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › American History and Culture
- Keywords
- DIY, self-realization, counterculture, DIY ethos, maker culture, DIY urbanism, suburban families
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review