Standpoint Then and Now
Abstract
This chapter explains the nature of standpoint epistemology; detail its evolution through the responses offered by its supporters to their critics; and briefly point to the continued fruitfulness of the approach. Standpoint theory shares with postmodernism a commitment to the situated knowledge thesis. The chapter offers an overview of each of the three theses characteristic of standpoint before discussing its evolution since its earliest versions in the mid-1980s. In its earliest formulation feminist standpoint theory is based on an analogy with Marxian accounts of the standpoint of the proletariat. According to the latter the working class occupies a unique social position within the capitalist system. Capitalism is defined in part as a system of production predicated on a division of labor by class. Alison Wylie has, building on the work of Patricia Hill Collins and earlier standpoint theorists, developed arguments for the inversion thesis that bring standpoint closer to feminist empiricism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some socially situated standpoints are epistemically privileged compared to others.
“Thus, a second way of cashing out epistemic privilege involves what Alessandra Tanesini calls the 'standpoint thesis': that some socially situated standpoints are epistemically privileged compared to others”
From Standpoint Epistemology and Epistemic Peerhood: A Defense of Epistemic Privilege (2024) · cites this paper as Tanesini 2019
The epistemic advantage thesis is the claim that social oppression inversely correlates to epistemic advantage.
“The first is what is sometimes referred to interchangeably as the inversion thesis or epistemic advantage thesis-the claim that social oppression inversely correlates to epistemic advantage”
From Standpoint Epistemology and Epistemic Peerhood: A Defense of Epistemic Privilege (2024) · cites this paper as Tanesini 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Standpoint Epistemology and Epistemic Peerhood: A Defense of Epistemic Privilege
TOOLE, B. (2024) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2023.6 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tanesini, A.
- Corresponding author
- Tanesini, Alessandra
- ORCID
- Tanesini, Alessandra
- Venue
- The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-07-19
- Pages
- 335-343
- OpenAlex
- W2963256512
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- standpoint epistemology, feminist standpoint theory, situated knowledge, postmodernism, feminist empiricism, capitalism, Patricia Hill Collins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review