Cited by 32Teaching and Learning ProgrammingEngineering Education and PedagogyDesign Education and Practice

Making as a Pathway to Engineering and Design

Martin, Lee, Dixon, Colin·2016·Makeology

Abstract

This chapter considers the potential of making as a set of activities that can set the stage for work within the discipline of engineering. It considers how making aligns with this view of engineering and presents the theoretical framework of adaptive expertise to guide thinking. It presents vignettes of two brothers participating in an out-of-school maker club, comparing and contrasting their experiences. The chapter considers how our data may inform efforts to integrate making into K-12 engineering education. There are obvious connections to be made here: engineers design and build things, often with the use of technological tools, and makers do the same. While making and the Maker Movement have developed and flourished primarily in out-of-school and informal spaces. There is substantial and growing interest in the education community for bringing making and elements of the Maker Movement into K-12 schools to reinvigorate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) curricula.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315726496-11

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, L., & Dixon, C.
Venue
Makeology
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2016-05-20
Pages
183-195
OpenAlex
W2950556615
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.38
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
Keywords
making, engineering education, adaptive expertise, maker culture, K-12 STEM education, informal learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review