Making as a Pathway to Engineering and Design
Abstract
This chapter considers the potential of making as a set of activities that can set the stage for work within the discipline of engineering. It considers how making aligns with this view of engineering and presents the theoretical framework of adaptive expertise to guide thinking. It presents vignettes of two brothers participating in an out-of-school maker club, comparing and contrasting their experiences. The chapter considers how our data may inform efforts to integrate making into K-12 engineering education. There are obvious connections to be made here: engineers design and build things, often with the use of technological tools, and makers do the same. While making and the Maker Movement have developed and flourished primarily in out-of-school and informal spaces. There is substantial and growing interest in the education community for bringing making and elements of the Maker Movement into K-12 schools to reinvigorate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) curricula.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maker activities lay the groundwork for engagement in engineering by developing practical skills including general engineering, experimental, tinkering, and design skills.
“As Martin and Dixon (2016) highlight, maker activities lay the groundwork for engagement in engineering by developing various practical skills including: general engineering, experimental, tinkering, and design skills.”
From Fostering students’ motivation and self-efficacy in science, technology, engineering, and design through design thinking and making in project-based learning: a gender-perspective study in primary education (2025) · cites this paper as Martin and Dixon (2016)
Cites
Lines of Practice: A Practice-Centered Theory of Interest Relationships
Azevedo, F. S. (2011) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.556834 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making sense of making: critical issues in the integration of maker education into schools
Godhe, A.-L., Lilja, P., & Selwyn, N. (2019) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2019.1610040 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Santos, P., El Aadmi, K., Calvera-Isabal, M., & Rodríguez, A. (2025) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-025-10001-6 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“As Martin and Dixon (2016) highlight, maker activities lay the groundwork for engagement in engineering by developing various practical skills including: general engineering, experimental, tinkering, and design skills.”
- Authors
- Martin, L., & Dixon, C.
- Venue
- Makeology
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-05-20
- Pages
- 183-195
- OpenAlex
- W2950556615
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Keywords
- making, engineering education, adaptive expertise, maker culture, K-12 STEM education, informal learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review