Self-determination and indigenous governance in the Arctic
Abstract
This chapter describes social, economic and environmental changes affect Arctic environments, wildlife, and communities in profound ways. Some Arctic states have recognized the need to settle some of the claims indigenous peoples advance for land and self-government, or have sought to pass legislation that recognizes the need for dialogue on land claims and resource rights. The arrangements where indigenous peoples have the greatest autonomy are to be found in the models of tribal sovereignty/self-government and land claims in Alaska, in comprehensive land claims agreements in Canada, and in the system of extensive self-government in Greenland. Greenland has often been considered a model for indigenous self-government, but it has been a process of nation-building rather than an ethno-political movement. Indigenous homelands, people&s;s livelihoods and traditional resource use in the Arctic are also being challenged today, however, by environmental change such as witnessed in the effects of climate variability and a rapidly warming Arctic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even with attempted erasure through settler colonialism, Indigenous communities, nations, and representative entities have actively resisted and advocated for self-determination and sovereignty both within and outside settler colonial states.
“Importantly, even with attempted erasure through settler colonialism, Indigenous communities, nations, and representative entities have actively resisted and advocated for self-determination and sovereignty both within and outside settler colonial states (Fondahl et al., 2001;Nuttall, 2018;Sulyandziga and Sulyandziga, 2020).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Nuttall, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M. (2022) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nuttall, M.
- Corresponding author
- Nuttall, Mark
- ORCID
- Nuttall, Mark
- Venue
- The Routledge Handbook of the Polar Regions
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-07-18
- Pages
- 67-80
- OpenAlex
- W2924611539
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
- Keywords
- Indigenous self-determination, Indigenous governance, Arctic peoples, land claims, resource rights, tribal sovereignty, climate change impacts, traditional resource use, nation-building
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review