The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Language of Hate: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of White Supremacist Language
Abstract
In this book, Andrew Brindle analyzes a corpus of texts taken from a white supremacist web forum which refer to the subject of homosexuality, drawing conclusions about the discourses of extremism and the dissemination of far-right hate speech online. The website from which Brindle’s corpus is drawn, Stormfront, has been described as the most powerful active influence in the White Nationalist movement (Kim 2005). Through a linguistic analysis of the data combining corpus linguistic methodologies and a critical discourse analysis approach, Brindle examines the language used to construct heterosexual, white masculinities, as well as posters’ representations of gay men, racial minorities and other out-groups, and how such groups are associated by the in-group. Brindle applies three types of analysis to the corpus: a corpus-driven approach centered on the study of frequency, keywords, collocation and concordance analyses; a detailed qualitative study of posts from the forum and the threads in which they are located; and a corpus-based approach which combines the corpus linguistic and qualitative analyses. The analysis of the data demonstrates a convergence of reactionary responses to not only women, gay men and lesbians, but also to racial minorities. Brindle’s findings suggest that due to the forum format of the data, topics are discussed and negotiated rather than dictated unilaterally as would be the case in a hierarchical organization. This research-based study of white supremacist discourse on the Internet facilitates understanding of hate speech and the behavior of extremist groups, with the aim of providing tools to combat elements of extremism and intolerance in society.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The topos of threat is common to both homophobia and transphobia (Lillian, 2005; Brindle, 2016; Colliver et al., 2019; Konopka et al., 2019; Baider, 2018, 2025).”
From “Real men in the battlefield”: a hybrid AI–discourse analysis of online homophobia and transphobia (2026) · cites this paper as Brindle, 2016
Citations
Cited by
Alatawi, H. S., Alhothali, A., & Moria, K. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3100435 · Cited by 121
“, the art of effective and compositional techniques for writing and speaking) [29] in their language.”
BackgroundLanguage and Masculinities: History, Development, and Future
Lawson, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011650 · Cited by 55
Carvalho, P., Caled, D., Silva, C., Batista, F., & Ribeiro, R. (2023) · Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict · doi:10.1075/jlac.00085.car · Cited by 24
Baider, F. H., & Constantinou, M. (2020) · Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict · doi:10.1075/jlac.00040.bai · Cited by 21
The discourse of the US alt-right online – a case study of the Traditionalist Worker Party blog
Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Nouri, L. (2020) · Critical Discourse Studies · doi:10.1080/17405904.2019.1708763 · Cited by 19
“Notable exceptions, focusing on online contexts, include analysis of the white supremacist website Stormfront.org (Baumgarten, 2017; Brindle, 2016a) and of the language of Trump’s supporters and their denial of racism on the social media platform Reddit (Subtirelu, 2017).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Brindle, A.
- Corresponding author
- Brindle, Andrew
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-05-20
- OpenAlex
- W4234459705
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- white supremacy, hate speech, Stormfront, online forums, online discourse, counter-extremism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Language of Hate: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of White Supremacist Language. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315731643
- The paper
- Brindle, A. (2016). The Language of Hate: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of White Supremacist Language. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731643