Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The entrepreneurial state

·2014·Governing Cross-Border Higher Education

Abstract

This chapter consider the ways in which governments regulate the inward movement of students, and the regulation of outbound student mobility. One notable feature of the frameworks considered in the chapter is the extensive regulatory frameworks in place in those countries that are the most active in recruiting full-fee-paying students, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. It considers the ways in which governments regulate the inward movement of students, and in the regulation of outbound student mobility. In these countries the state does not usually fund or directly provide education to foreign students, but a dense web of regulatory measures is in place to govern a market in which relatively autonomous providers engage with and recruit independently mobile students. In other places in which host governments are able to control the flow of students more directly by funding and/or providing education, such extensive regulatory frameworks are not as evident.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315764016-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Venue
Governing Cross-Border Higher Education
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2014-07-25
Pages
25-49
OpenAlex
W4242992488
Cited by
173
References
0
FWCI
75.05
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The entrepreneurial state. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315764016-2
The paper
The entrepreneurial state. (2014). Governing Cross-Border Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764016-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.