Food Sovereignty in International Context: Discourse, politics and practice of place
Abstract
1. Putting Food Sovereignty in Place Amy Trauger Part 1: Discourse 2. Where are the Local Communities? Food Sovereignty Discourses on International Agrobiodiversity Conservation Strategies Claudio Brenni 3. Farmers, Foodies and First Nations: Getting to Food Sovereignty in Canada? Annette Aurelie Desmarais and Hannah Wittman 4. Food Sovereignty in the Global North: The Application of a Social Justice Framework for a Common Language and Approach Alanna Higgins 5. Framing Food Provisioning Research in the UK: Whither Food Sovereignty? Carol Morris, Susanne Seymour and Adam Spencer Part 2: Politics 6. Food Security, Food Sovereignty, and the Nation-state: Historicizing Norwegian Farmland Policy Heidi Vinge 7. Repositioning Food Sovereignty: Between Ecuadorian Nationalist and Cosmopolitan Politics Alberto Arce, Stephen Sherwood and Myriam Paredes 8. Seed Sovereignty as Civil Disobedience in Northern India? Amy Trauger 9. Talking Around TT: Food Sovereignty as Unifying Discourse in the Southern Alberta Food System Trina Filan Part 3: Practice 10. Framing Multiple Food Sovereignties: Comparing the Nyeleni Declaration and the Local Food and Self-Governance Ordinance in Maine Hilda E. Kurtz 11. Gender, Food Sovereignty and Agrarian Reforms Susie Jacobs 12. Food Sovereignty in the Fields: Seed Exchange and Participatory Plant Breeding of Wheat Landraces in Italy Elisa Da Via 13. When Global goes Sweet, Locals turn Sour: Wine Sovereignty in Switzerland Melaine Laessle
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The food sovereignty movement challenged the globalized, neoliberal, industrial, capital-intensive, corporate-led model of agriculture that created destructive economic policies that marginalized small-scale farmers, removed them from their land, and forced them into the global market economy as wage laborers.
“The food sovereignty movement challenged the hegemony of the globalized, neoliberal, industrial, capital-intensive, corporate-led model of agriculture that created destructive economic policies that marginalized small-scale farmers, removed them from their land, and forced them into the global market economy as wage laborers.”
From “Indigenizing” Food Sovereignty. Revitalizing Indigenous Food Practices and Ecological Knowledges in Canada and the United States (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
This neo-colonial process impoverished millions of peasants and Indigenous peoples by displacing them from the land, resulting in many being forced into wage labor to serve the global food economy.
“This neo-colonial process impoverished millions of peasants and Indigenous peoples by displacing them from the land, resulting in many of them being forced into wage labor to serve the global food economy [2][3][4][5][6][7].”
From “Indigenizing” Food Sovereignty. Revitalizing Indigenous Food Practices and Ecological Knowledges in Canada and the United States (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
La Via Campesina emphasized that the current regime continued to promote agricultural practices that benefited transnational corporations while undermining small-scale farmers.
“They also emphasized that the current regime continued to promote agricultural practices that benefitted transnational corporations while undermining small-scale farmers [2][3][4][5][6][7].”
From “Indigenizing” Food Sovereignty. Revitalizing Indigenous Food Practices and Ecological Knowledges in Canada and the United States (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
Indigenous peoples with fishing, hunting, and gathering traditions were able to connect to food sovereignty's underlying philosophy that all nations, including Indigenous nations, have the right to define strategies and policies and develop food systems and practices that reflected their own cultural values.
“While this movement developed in an agrarian-based, Latin American context ( [5], p. 1), Indigenous peoples with fishing, hunting, and gathering traditions were able to connect to its underlying philosophy that all nations, including Indigenous nations, have the right to define strategies and policies and develop food systems and practices that reflected their own cultural values around producing,”
From “Indigenizing” Food Sovereignty. Revitalizing Indigenous Food Practices and Ecological Knowledges in Canada and the United States (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coté, C. (2016) · Humanities · doi:10.3390/h5030057 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Coté, C. (2019) · Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development · doi:10.5304/jafscd.2019.09a.003 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-02-11
- OpenAlex
- W1595063614
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 12.92
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
- Keywords
- food sovereignty, agrobiodiversity conservation, food security, seed sovereignty, civil disobedience, food provisioning, agricultural land policy, nation-state, local food systems, land reform, seed exchange, participatory plant breeding, wheat landraces, social justice, First Nations, Canada, Norway, Ecuador, India, Switzerland, southern Alberta
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
