The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Place in Research
Abstract
Bridging environmental and Indigenous studies and drawing on critical geography, spatial theory, new materialist theory, and decolonizing theory, this dynamic volume examines the sometimes overlooked significance of place in social science research. There are often important divergences and even competing logics at work in these areas of research, some which may indeed be incommensurable. This volume explores how researchers around the globe are coming to terms - both theoretically and practically - with place in the context of settler colonialism, globalization, and environmental degradation. Tuck and McKenzie outline a trajectory of critical place inquiry that not only furthers empirical knowledge, but ethically imagines new possibilities for collaboration and action. Critical place inquiry can involve a range of research methodologies; this volume argues that what matters is how the chosen methodology engages conceptually with place in order to mobilize methods that enable data collection and analyses that address place explicitly and politically. Unlike other approaches that attempt to superficially tag on Indigenous concerns, decolonizing conceptualizations of land and place and Indigenous methods are central, not peripheral, to practices of critical place inquiry.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The apocalypse has been underway since 1492, when Columbus's Santa María wrecked and he claimed the island and its people for Spain.
“However, from an Indigenous perspective, the apocalypse has been underway since 1492, ever since Columbus' nau (or carrack), Santa María, wrecked on the shores of Ayiti, and he claimed the island and its people for Spain and the Christian god.”
From What Is There to Do If You Find an Old Indian Canoe? Anti-Colonialism in Maritime Archaeology (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
Traditional thinking lacks a division between the political and spiritual, or the scientific and spiritual.
“despite the absence in traditional thinking of a division between the political and spiritual, or the scientific and spiritual [17,46,[51][52][53].”
From What Is There to Do If You Find an Old Indian Canoe? Anti-Colonialism in Maritime Archaeology (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McCarty, T. L., Lee, T. S., Noguera, J., Yepa, W., & Nicholas, S. E. (2022) · Comparative Education Review · doi:10.1086/720509 · Cited by 30
What Is There to Do If You Find an Old Indian Canoe? Anti-Colonialism in Maritime Archaeology
Rich, S. A., Sievers-Cail, C., & Patterson, K. (2022) · Heritage · doi:10.3390/heritage5040191 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M.
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2014-08-07
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review